Completion rates
Students in the same cohort progress through the ITE pipeline on different timelines.[28] In fact, within any given cohort, there are 3 possible student outcomes: students could have completed
their studies, discontinued their ITE program or remain enrolled. Completion rates help with understanding the progression of students through the ITE pipeline.
Completion rates are calculated as the proportion of a commencing cohort who completed an ITE program. For this publication, this includes completion of an undergraduate program over a 4-year (postgraduate) or 6-year (undergraduate) timeframe.
Overall completion rates are available for up to, and including, the 2017 commencing undergraduate ITE cohort, and the 2019 commencing postgraduate ITE cohort. These are the students that have reached the respective 6- and 4-year completion timeframes
in 2022.
Trends in completion rates can be useful for estimating potential future teacher supply, because they show what proportion of commencing students in a cohort are likely to complete their degree. Completion rates are affected by a combination of
complex factors, including, but not limited to, the characteristics of students, the chosen mode of attendance for study, changes to program offerings and the length of ITE programs.
Calculating completion rates
In this publication, completion timeframes reported for undergraduate and postgraduate ITE students are 6 years and 4 years, respectively. The ATWD also has completion rates over a 10-year timeframe available in the Data Portal (see also
Figure 20 and Figure 21).
The 6- and 4-year timeframes reflect the point by which almost all ITE students have completed their studies or exited their program: 7% of undergraduates and 4% of postgraduates were still enrolled after 6 and 4 years respectively. Historically,
around half of those still enrolled at 6 or 4 years are ‘later’ completers who go on to complete within 9 years (Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership, 2024a). Since most students have completed within 6 or 4 years, the potential benefit of capturing a slightly larger share of completing students with a longer completion rate timeframe is outweighed by the real benefit of reporting on more recent cohorts.
Among ‘later’ completers across all tertiary studies in Australia, a slightly greater proportion of online and multi-modal students completed between 7 and 9 years, relative to on-campus students. This also holds true for those
studying part-time versus full-time (Australian Government Department of Education, 2023).
Degree level
Across undergraduate and postgraduate programs of all types, completion rates have declined over time.
As shown in Figure 19, completion rates for both undergraduate and postgraduate ITE students have declined since the 2012 commencing cohorts.
Undergraduate students in the 2017 commencing cohort were 6 years post-commencement in 2022. For this cohort, 6-year completion rates were 48%, a decrease of 5 percentage points compared to students who commenced in 2012 (53%).
This decrease is partially due to broader changes to undergraduate ITE programs from 2012 to 2017. In particular, 2-year undergraduate Bachelor Graduate entry programs[29] were replaced
by postgraduate programs and no longer offered. This meant that all undergraduate ITE programs were longer than 2 years in length. There was also a general shift in ACECQA-recognised early childhood undergraduate programs from 3 years
to 4 years in duration.
Postgraduate students in the 2019 commencing cohort were 4 years post-commencement in 2022. For this cohort, 4-year completion rates were 63%, a decrease of 12 percentage points compared to students who commenced in 2012 (75%).
The decrease in 4-year postgraduate completion rates is likely due to the complete phasing out of 1-year postgraduate ITE programs between 2013 and 2018. As longer degrees typically have lower completion rates, extending postgraduate ITE program
lengths by an additional year likely resulted in a reduction in completion rates.
The overall decline in completion rates over the last 6 undergraduate and 8 postgraduate cohorts may have adverse implications for future teacher workforce supply, since fewer people are successfully graduating from the ITE pipeline and transitioning
into the workforce.
Figure 19: Completion rates by degree level; 2012-2019 commencing cohorts
It is important to note that some undergraduate and postgraduate ITE students go on to complete their programs after 6 or 4 years. As shown in Figure 20, from the 2005 undergraduate commencing cohort to the 2013
undergraduate commencing cohort, 10-year completion rates were between 2 and 3 percentage points higher than 6-year completion rates.
Similarly, as shown in Figure 21,[30] from the 2006 postgraduate commencing cohort to the 2016 postgraduate commencing cohort, 7-year completion rates were
between 1 and 3 percentage points higher than 4-year completion rates.
For more information and data on completion rates by various student and study characteristics, visit the Australian Teacher Workforce Data Portal.
Figure 20: Completion rates by commencing cohort, undergraduate; 2005-2021 commencing cohorts
Figure 21: Completion rates by commencing cohort, postgraduate; 2005-2021 commencing cohorts
Program type
Undergraduate programs
Completion rates have declined for all types of undergraduate ITE programs from the 2012 commencing cohort (students who were 6 years post-commencement by 2017) to the 2017 commencing cohort (students who were 6 years post-commencement
by 2022). The largest completion rate declines were observed across early childhood and early childhood/primary programs, while there were smaller decreases for primary and secondary programs.
From the 2012 commencing cohort to the 2017 commencing cohort, early childhood (birth-5) programs declined by 14 percentage points to 41%, while early childhood/primary (birth-8/birth-12) decreased by 11 percentage points to 42%.
Completion rates also decreased for primary and secondary undergraduate programs, which together comprise the majority of undergraduate commencements. From the 2012 commencing cohort to the 2017 commencing cohort, completion rates for
primary programs fell by 5 percentage points to 51%, while secondary programs fell by 3 percentage points to 49% (Figure 22).
Figure 22: Completion rates by undergraduate program type; 2012-2017 commencing cohorts
Postgraduate programs
From the 2014 commencing cohort (students who were 4 years post commencement by 2017) to the 2019 commencing cohort (students who were 4 years post commencement by 2022), primary postgraduate programs recorded the largest decrease in completion
rates, falling by 20 percentage points to 59%. Over the same period, secondary postgraduate programs declined by 9 percentage points to 68% (Table 5).
The decline in postgraduate program completion rates[31] can be at least partially attributed to the transition to 2-year postgraduate ITE programs in 2015, which extended the length
of postgraduate ITE programs by an additional year and longer degrees have lower completion rates.
Table 5: Completion rates by postgraduate program type (primary, secondary); 2014-2019 commencing cohorts
| Postgraduate |
Program type | 2014 | 2019 | Percentage point change |
Primary | 79% | 59% | -20 |
Secondary | 77% | 68% | -9 |
From 2015 to 2019,[32] early childhood/primary (birth-8/birth-12) postgraduate completion rates declined by 13 percentage points from 67% to 54%. In 2019, early childhood
(birth-5) postgraduate completion rates were 67%.
Completion rates are the proportion of a commencing cohort who completed an ITE program. Completion rates vary by study characteristics. Students who study part-time or online are much less likely to complete both undergraduate and postgraduate programs.
There are a variety of student and study characteristics[33] that are associated with lower (and higher) completion rates.
When interpreting the data, it is important to note that although a characteristic may be associated with a lower completion rate, it is not necessarily the cause of the lower completion rate – this is because characteristics may covary.[34] For example, ITE students studying online have lower-than-average completion rates, but these students are also more likely to be mature-aged and studying part-time, which are both also associated with lower completion rates. Therefore, the effects of studying online, being mature-aged, or studying part-time, on completion rates cannot be interpreted in isolation.
Mode of attendance
Across the most recent undergraduate and postgraduate cohorts, ITE students studying online had lower completion rates than students studying on-campus and multi-modally (Figure 23):[35]
- For the 2017 commencing cohort, the 6-year completion rate for undergraduates studying online was 34%, compared to 53% for students studying on-campus/multi-modally (19 percentage points lower).
- For the 2019 commencing cohort, the 4-year completion rate for postgraduates studying online was 45%, compared to 71% for students studying on-campus/multi-modally (26 percentage points lower).
Completion rates for students studying online have also decreased at a faster rate than for students studying on-campus and multi-modally. Since 2012:
- For undergraduates studying online, completion rates declined by 6 percentage points, compared to a 4-percentage point decrease for on-campus/multi-modal students.
- For postgraduates studying online, completion rates declined by 18 percentage points, compared to an 8-percentage point decrease for on-campus/multi-modal students.
- Note, the phasing out of 1-year postgraduate programs from 2015-2018 likely contributed to this trend as longer programs typically have lower completion rates.
Figure 23: Completion rates by mode of attendance; 2012-2017 commencing cohorts (undergraduate), 2012-2019 commencing cohorts (postgraduate)
Given the lower completion rates for online programs, the number of overall ITE commencements would need to increase sizeably to ensure an equivalent supply of graduates. From 2012 to 2020, the proportion of online commencements increased from 22% to 30%, though overall commencements decreased. This suggests that online study did not increase overall commencements, but rather displaced some on-campus and/or multi-modal commencements. Consequently, given the lower completion rates for students studying online, there is likely to be a continued decline in the overall number of completions through to 2025, unless more support is provided to improve completion rates across study modes. However, as the proportion of online commencements remained steady at between 30% to 31% from 2020 to 2022, the number of ITE completions may stabilise from 2025 onwards as those commencing cohorts progress through the pipeline.
Age
For both undergraduate and postgraduate programs, ITE students were generally less likely to complete their program as their age at commencement increased. The effect of age on completion rates was also more pronounced at the postgraduate level:
- In the 2017 commencing cohort, the 6-year undergraduate completion rates were 52% for students aged 25 or under, compared to 38% for students aged 26-30 and 40% for students aged 31 and over.
- In the 2019 commencing cohort, the 4-year postgraduate completion rate for students aged 30 and under was 69%, compared to 52% for students aged 31 and over (Figure 24).
Postgraduate completion rates have decreased at a greater rate for older students over time. Since the 2014 commencing cohort, postgraduate completion rates for students aged 31 and over have declined by 18 percentage points, compared to a 13-percentage point decrease for those aged 30 and under.
In contrast, undergraduate completion rates have decreased at similar rates across all age groups. Since the 2012 commencing cohort, each age group recorded a decrease in completion rates between 4 and 7 percentage points.
ITE students aged 31 and over tend to have lower completion rates than their younger counterparts. There are several characteristics that are common among older students that are associated with lower completion rates, such as studying
part-time and/or online, which may be due to the need for older ITE students to balance family commitments, maintain financial commitments through ongoing employment, and/or engage in a mid-career change (Stone, 2019). Consequently,
if older students are provided with additional support to aid their progression through the ITE pipeline, it could represent an opportunity to bolster future teacher workforce supply.
Figure 24: Completion rates by age; 2012-2017 commencing cohorts (undergraduate), 2012-2019 commencing cohorts (postgraduate)
Full-time status
Full-time ITE students, across both undergraduate and postgraduate programs, have consistently recorded higher completion rates than part-time students (Figure 25).
From the 2012 to 2017 commencing cohorts, 6-year completion rates for part-time undergraduate ITE students decreased by 4 percentage points to 26% – the lowest among all categories. Full-time undergraduate completion rates decreased
by 5 percentage points to 54% over the same period.
From the 2014 to 2019 commencing cohorts, 4-year completion rates for postgraduate students studying part-time decreased by 24 percentage points to 32%. Full-time postgraduate completion rates decreased by 13 percentage points to 70% in
the same period. The gap in completion rates between full-time and part-time postgraduate students narrowed from 43 percentage points in 2018 to 38 percentage points in 2019. However, this is due to full-time postgraduate completion
rates decreasing at a faster rate than part-time completion rates, rather than an improvement in part-time completion rates.
Figure 25: Completion rates by full-time status and degree level; 2012-2017 commencing cohorts (undergraduate), 2014-2019 cohorts (postgraduate)
Basis of admission
All undergraduate basis of admission pathways recorded a decline in completion rates from the 2012 to 2017 commencing cohorts, except for admissions on the basis of prior higher education (Figure 26).
Generally, completion rates for students admitted via an ATAR greater than 70 are higher than for students entering via all other means. Among the 2017 undergraduate cohort entering on the basis of their ATAR, there was a broadly linear
relationship between ATAR scores and completion rates. In the 2017 cohort, those with an ATAR between 80 and 99.95 recorded a completion rate of 64%. In comparison, those with an ATAR between 70 and 79.95 had a completion rate of 56%
and those with an ATAR below 70 had a completion rate of 49%.
Notably, completion rates for students admitted on the basis of VET declined from the 2012 to 2017 commencing cohorts, falling by 15 percentage points to 35%. This decline for VET admission completion rates is likely to affect program
types differently; 70% of all commencing undergraduate birth-5 ITE students are admitted on the basis of VET, compared to only 12% for primary programs and 7% for secondary programs (in 2022). This indicates that VET admission students
may require additional support to aid their progression through the ITE pipeline (Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership, 2024b).
Completion rates for students admitted on the basis of higher education increased from 39% in the 2012 commencing cohort to 45% in the 2017 commencing cohort. Admissions on the basis of higher education can be achieved through a complete
or incomplete award course, or enabling/bridging course. Additionally, to the extent that these students are older, their completion rates may be impacted by ITE student age rather than basis of admission type.
Figure 26: Completion rates by basis of admission pathway, undergraduate ITE students; 2012-2017 commencing cohorts
Other characteristics
Two other student characteristics captured in the ATWD that completion rates vary by, gender and socioeconomic status, are presented below in Table 6 and Table 7. For undergraduate
students, the 2012 and 2017 commencing cohorts were 6 years post-commencement in 2017 and 2022, respectively. For postgraduate students, the 2014 and 2019 commencing cohorts were 4 years post-commencement in 2017 and 2022, respectively.
In general, over time and across both undergraduate and postgraduate ITE programs, women have tended to have higher completion rates than men. This trend reversed in the 2019 commencing postgraduate cohort.
Students with a higher socio-economic status have generally recorded higher completion rates than students with a lower socio-economic status, across cohorts and degree levels. Notably, the gap in completion rates between students with
a lower socio-economic status and a higher socio-economic status has widened over the last 6 cohorts, across both undergraduate and postgraduate students.
Table 6: Completion rates by undergraduate student characteristics; 2012 and 2017 commencing cohorts
| Undergraduate completion rates |
| 2012 commencing cohort | 2017 commencing cohort |
Gender | Men | 46% | vs. | 55% | Women | Men | 43% | vs. | 49% | Women |
Socioeconomic status | Low | 50% | vs. | 55% | High | Low | 43% | vs. | 52% | High |
Table 7: Completion rates by postgraduate student characteristics; 2014 and 2018 commencing cohorts
| Postgraduate completion rates |
| 2014 commencing cohort | 2019 commencing cohort |
Gender | Men | 75% | vs. | 79% | Women | Men | 64% | vs. | 62% | Women |
Socioeconomic status | Low | 75% | vs. | 78% | High | Low | 56% | vs. | 69% | High |
First-year attrition
First-year attrition rates refer to the percentage of students, as a proportion of all commencements, who did not progress to their second calendar year of ITE study. Year-on-year attrition is most routinely observed in the window between program
commencement and the second year of study and provides an early indication of potential future declines in ITE program completion rates (Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership, 2024c).
Over the period from 2012 to 2020,[36] and particularly since 2016, there has been a gradual convergence in first-year attrition rates across undergraduate and postgraduate ITE programs.
First-year attrition rates for postgraduate programs have trended slowly upwards, increasing from 13% in 2016 to 16% in 2020 (+3 percentage points). In contrast, undergraduate first-year attrition rates have gradually declined, decreasing from 21%
in 2016 to 18% in 2020 (-3 percentage points).
Consequently, the gap in first-year attrition rates across undergraduate and postgraduate ITE programs has narrowed from 8 percentage points in 2016 to 2 percentage points in 2020, as seen below in Figure 27.
It is important to note that the increase in postgraduate attrition rates was influenced by important policy changes. From 2012 to 2018, both 1- and 2-year postgraduate programs were available to ITE students. However, 1-year programs were being phased
out. Given that first-year attrition can only be meaningfully calculated for full-time students undertaking courses more than one year in duration, it does not apply to the 1-year programs that still existed during this period, resulting in a
lower attrition rate at the postgraduate level. As more programs transitioned to being 2 years long, it was increasingly possible for students to choose not to progress to their second year of study, thereby increasing the first-year attrition
rate. By 2019, no 1-year postgraduate programs existed, meaning that it is not possible to directly compare the 2019-2020 period to the 2016-2018 period, as the former would naturally have a much higher attrition rate that only reflects a change
in program length, rather than student intentions.
Nevertheless, changes in first-year attrition rates have a bearing on future completion rates. The steady increase in postgraduate first-year attrition rates will result in a decline in future postgraduate completion rates, which in turn, could result
in a decline in teacher workforce supply.
Figure 27: First-year attrition rates by degree level; 2016-2020
State of the pipeline
The ITE pipeline is the main source of teacher supply in Australia. Over the last decade, the ITE pipeline has undergone a period of change – including increases in the proportion of students studying online, changes to postgraduate program
lengths, and significant disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The national trends described in this report explore the impact of these changes, and highlight the ongoing challenges in both attracting new students into the ITE pipeline
and retaining them through to program completion.
The number of new students entering the ITE pipeline has been generally declining – ITE commencements fell by 24% between 2017 and 2022. ITE completion rates have also been consistently declining over time, across degree types and various student
and study characteristics.
Online program completion rates are much lower, and decreasing at a faster rate, than on-campus programs. This is notable because the proportion of ITE students studying online increased over the decade, displacing some on-campus commencements. This
has supply implications – if online completion rates do not improve over time, there may be a continued decrease in ITE completions, as fewer people successfully move through the pipeline to program completion. However, the proportion of
online commencements stagnated from 2020 to 2022, which means completions may stabilise rather than continuing to decrease, from around 2025 onwards.
In addition to students studying online, those who study part-time and those aged 31 or over are less likely to complete their degree. Other cohorts have also experienced declines in completion rates, such as students admitted on the basis of VET.
In order to combat these supply issues, there may be a need to provide additional, targeted support to these particular cohorts to improve completion rates.
As the student-aged population in Australia continues to grow at a steady pace, the ITE pipeline remains vital in ensuring there are enough teachers in every school and early learning setting. The shifting composition of the ITE pipeline, as well
as changes in commencement and completion numbers, has been occurring within the context of a complex and intersecting suite of policy changes. It therefore remains to be seen whether emerging trends will continue in future years or what impact
policy initiatives may have in this space.
As more ATWD data continues to become available each year, the ATWD will further leverage its longitudinal ITE dataset to explore these trends over time – continuing to build a comprehensive picture of the progression from ITE commencement to
completion and entry into the teacher workforce.